US Congress agency recommends 4 blockchain policy possibilities

GAO’s mission is to assist policymakers, including Congress, federal agencies, state and local governments, in using blockchain technology seamlessly.

The United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report at the request of the United States Congress outlining four policy options to assist policymakers in using blockchain technologies while maximizing benefits and limiting risks.

The GAO’s technology evaluation recognized the potential of blockchain technology to improve a range of financial and non-financial applications, despite concerns about bringing new obstacles in the process of resolving issues with established systems:

“A blockchain might both increase the speed of a title registry system and lower the cost of title insurance by making title registration simpler and more trustworthy.”

However, the study highlights several obstacles, including unknown benefits, data reliability, and regulatory compliance.

b1 21

The flowchart above is intended to assist policymakers — including members of Congress, federal agencies, state and municipal governments, academic and research organizations, and industry — in determining if blockchain deployment is required.

The GAO assessment further highlighted various non-financial implementations of blockchain technology, as shown below.

b2 13

While policymakers have the authority to maintain the status quo, the GAO identified four policy alternatives for streamlining the decision-making process associated with mainstream blockchain implementation: standards, oversight, educational materials, and appropriate applications.

By establishing standards, GAO hopes to address issues such as interoperability and data security. Several factors to consider include the deployment of consensus procedures and the establishment of globally accepted standards.

According to the GAO, an oversight policy can “assist in resolving legal and regulatory uncertainties, as well as regulatory arbitrage.” Additionally, the GAO suggests that instructional materials be distributed to address issues of poor knowledge and ambiguous benefits and costs.

The fourth policy option, suitable uses, discusses reducing risks to financial systems and the unpredictability of gains and costs. The evaluation adds, emphasizing the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) lack of jurisdiction to engage with non-governmental entities:

“Legal or regulatory uncertainty may hinder some potential users from benefitting from blockchain.”

The Virginia Senate overwhelmingly accepted a legislative amendment request on March 5 that authorizes traditional banks in the region to now provide virtual currency custody services.

According to Cointelegraph, Delegate Christopher T. Head introduced the bill in January 2022, stating:

“A bank may provide its customers with virtual currency custody services so long as the bank has 26 adequate protocols in place to effectively manage risks and comply with applicable laws.”

The bill passed Senate with a sweeping 39-0 vote and is waiting to be signed into law by Governor of Virginia Glenn Youngkin.

Disclaimer: These are the writer’s opinions and should not be considered investment advice. Readers should do their own research.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Recent Posts

Follow Us