Telegram Takes Alleged Trademark Squatter to Court over Cryptocurrency Naming Rights

Telegram Takes Alleged Trademark Squatter to Court over Cryptocurrency Naming Rights

Scrambled informing organization Telegram has recorded a trademark suit against a Florida organization that likewise plans to make a digital money named “gram.”

The suit, which was documented on May 11 in the San Francisco branch of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, claims that Lantah LLC abused Telegram’s administration stamp rights when it recorded a trademark application for “gram” in February. The news was first revealed by legitimate production The Recorder.

As CCN has announced, the Pavel Durov-driven firm raised $1.7 billion from a gathering of under 200 licensed speculators to finance the improvement without bounds Telegram Open Network (TON), whose local digital currency will be called GRAM.

Nonetheless, in February Lantah LLC documented a trademark enlistment for “gram,” expressing that it proposed to build up a “virtual cash for use by individuals from an on-line group by means of a worldwide PC arrange.” That application, unexpectedly, was recorded after Telegram had started raising assets for its system.

Telegram Takes Alleged Trademark Squatter to Court over Cryptocurrency Naming Rights

Message guarantees that it has obtained “custom-based law trademark rights” to GRAM since it has just led a “generally provided details regarding and exceptionally fruitful offering of Purchase Agreements” utilizing the term. The firm further asserts that Lantah is working in lacking honesty and tries to benefit from mark disarray.

From the grumbling:

Lantah’s unauthorized use in commerce of a service mark that is confusingly similar to Telegram Messenger’s GRAM mark has caused and is likely to continue to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive consumers and potential consumers, the public, and the trade concerning an affiliation, connection, or association between Lantah and Telegram when there is no such affiliation, connection, or association.

Such brand perplexity can have genuine outcomes. At the point when Venezuela started tolerating preorders for its “petro” digital currency prior this year, an irrelevant token of a similar name quickly encountered an articulated value rally as confounded speculators acquired it supposing they were purchasing the state-sponsored token.

Daniel Jeffrey, the vital proprietor of Lantah LLC, told CCN in a messaged explanation that, in spite of Telegram’s claim, Lantah was utilizing the “gram” trademark before it was even mindful that Telegram had chosen to advertise an item under a similar name.

“Lantah was freely utilizing the Gram name before we were even mindful of Telegram’s choice to showcase one of their items with a similar name. This was went down by the accessibility of the trademark,” he said. “We are currently having the issue audited by advise.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here